Full details are in “An introduction to ISO/IEC 27001:2022/Amd 1:2024” by David Brewer

Introduction

All new and revised management system standards conform to the ISO Directives concerning high level structure and identical core text. The idea is that requirements that ought to be the same for all management system standards (e.g. corrective action) ought to be identically worded – and now they are. Requirements that are peculiar to a particular discipline (e.g. quality) are incorporated in what is known as “discipline-specific text”. Full details are in David Brewer’s book: “Understanding the new ISO management system standards”. The third edition of ISO/IEC 27001 was published in October 2022 and the first amendment in February 2024.

Structure

The following figure shows the high level structure (blue text) together with the discipline-specific requirement headings for ISO/IEC 27001:2022/Amd 1:2024.

A detailed explanation of ISO/IEC 27001:2022/Amd 1:2024 is given in in David Brewer’s book: “An introduction to ISO/IEC 27001:2022/Amd 1:2024” 5^th Edition”.

ISO/IEC 27001:2022/Amd 1:2024

ISO/IEC 27001 specifies the requirements for an Information Security Management System (ISMS). In summary:

1. A management system is a way of life, a journey not a destination. To best adapt the standard to the context and established doctrine and culture of an organisation, the standard specifies what an organisation must must be done to achieve conformance not how it is to be doneThis is like being given the ingredients and told to make a cake, but not being given the recipe. You cannot buy an ISMS like a car or an off-the-peg suit of clothes. It is more like a custom car or bepoke tailoring, designed and crafted to fit the driver or wearer, or in the case of your ISMS, your organisation..
2. The focus of ISO/IEC 27001 is on preserving the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of information within scope of the ISMS.
3. The standard requires organisations to determine the information security controls that an organisation needs through the process of risk assessment and risk treatment.
4. The risk assessment requirements are aligned with ISO 31000 (“Risk management — principles and guidelines”). The easiest way to do this is to consider events and consequences.
5. As a safety net to ensure that no necessary control has been inadvertently overlooked, the standard requires organisations to compare the necessary controls that it has determined with those in ISO/IEC 27001, Annex A. It is important to understand that these Annex A controls are not requirements. The requirement is the cross-checking process.
6. The Statement of Applicability (SOA) is required to include all the necessary controls and all excluded Annex A controls. There is no requirement to structure a SOA in terms of Annex A controls. However, it is prudent to be able to show the mapping between necessary controls and Annex A controls.
7. Moreover, as explained in ISO/IEC 27003 (“ISMS — Guidance”), necessary controls do not have to be Annex A controls. It refers to necessary controls that are not Annex A controls as custom controls.
8. Whilst certification audit plans typically address Annex A controls, the ISO/IEC 27006 (“Requirements for bodies providing audit and certification of ISMS”) requirement is for auditors to review the necessary controls as specified in the organisation’s SOA. If an organisation’s risk treatment plans (RTPs) specify how the necessary controls are intended to modify risk, audit of such RTPs will ensure coverage of the organisation’s necessary controls.
9. Fulfilment of the requirements for performance evaluation is best served by first determining the organisation’s information needs, as advocated by ISO/IEC 27004 (“ISMS — Monitoring, measurement, analysis and evaluation”). Thus, first determine what you are going to do with the information that you obtain from monitoring and measuring. It is a good idea to include the fulfilment of your information security objectives in your portfolio of measurements.
10. There are just sixteen requirements for documented information, albeit organisations are required to retain documented information on whatever else they deem necessary for the effectiveness of their ISMS.

ISO/IEC 27001:2022/Amd 1:2024 is the third edition (first amendment) of the ISMS standard. The first edition was published in 2005, and the second in 2013.

Changes from the second edition

The most important change is that the content of Annex A has been aligned with the controls in ISO/IEC 27002:2022. However, there are other changes which result from the revised Harmonised Structure.

The Harmonised Structure is part of the ISO Directives that dictate the structure and requirements that are common to all management system standards. It was revised in 2020 to add clarity. However, these changes should not affect existing ISMS that have been properly implemented.

An example

Clause 4.2 has a new bullet point. The clause deals with understanding the needs and expectations of interested parties. The clause already required organisations to determine the interested parties that are relevant to the ISMS and their requirements. The new bullet point requires organisations to determine which of these requirements will be addressed through the ISMS.

An interested party can be a person or entity that can affect an organisation. Thus, as pointed out in ISO/IEC 27005:2022, a hacker is an interested party. Their requirements are for weak security. Notwithstanding that such requirements would be rejected by the organisation and will not become organisational requirements, they will still be addressed through the ISMS — addressed by the information security controls necessary to protect the organisation from such nefarious activities. Organisations should already be doing this.

If a client has a requirement for a service that the organisation chooses not to provide, then provided that requirement it does not become a contractual requirement, it is not relevant to the ISMS (since it does not affect the outcome of the ISMS). In this case, the requirement is not addressed by the ISMS, but then it would never have been.

Thus. the new bullet should have no effect on a properly implemented ISMS.

Other changes are discussed in a BSI publication.

Climate change — the amendment

In common with all other management system standards, ISO/IEC 27001 was amended in February 2024 to clarify that climate change should be consided when determining issues and interested party requirements. Further details can be found here.

Transition arrangements

The three-year transition period has now started – 6 months for accreditation bodies to complete their preparations, 6 months for certification bodies to become accredited for the new standard and then two years for certified organisations to transition to the new standard. However, it is strongly recommended that organisations do not wait — “Since use of the revised Annex A, can discover exposure to unacceptable information security risk, early adoption of ISO/IEC 27001:2022 should be encouraged”.

Further advice

Futher advice on the changes and how to transition your ISMS is given in David Brewer’s new book “An introduction to ISO/IEC 27001:2022/Amd 1:2024”, which is available on Amazon.

Guidance, written by Dr Brewer, is also given on the BSI website, but for a price — £75. His book is cheaper.

There is also a free guide, written by Dr Brewer, to the ISO/IEC 27000 series of standards (numbers 1 to 7) on the BSI website and also to ISO/IEC 27005:2022.